← Search

Kelly Edmiaston

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 122W–110L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history232 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Maher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-23 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen HIckman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Maher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellie Esry
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Davis
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronnie Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Gaskill
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamia Weir
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronnie Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.4% of games
3.25
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.5% of games
3.5
55.6%
45W–36L · 52.8% of games
4.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 42.5% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 48.8% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 48.9% of games
3.5mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
49 matches
Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer