← Search

Jake Ladue

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elkins, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 40W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Fenton mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Scott Chesshir mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Fenton mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · Garrett-Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Fenton mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Fenton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Fenton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-14 · Garrett/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Baird
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-29 · Garrett/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-19 · Garrett/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with SANDEEP KANAMALA
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hierholzer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 60.8% of games
3.25
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
3.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 36.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#1 Singles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert