← Search

Timothy Grailer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bella Vista, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
322 matches · 168W–154L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history322 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Carter/Rogers/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reid Osborn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-19 · Carter/Rogers/KTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Yeager
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-10 · Carter/Rogers/KTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Naga Valiveti
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Ferrer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Madrid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · Gonzalez-Madrid/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · Popejoy/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Watkins/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Yeager
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-05-06 · Watkins/Bentonville/KTC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Yeager
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.25
100%
7W–0L · 76.4% of games
3.5
75%
57W–19L · 59.1% of games
4.0
31.4%
16W–35L · 43.8% of games
6.5
60%
15W–10L · 50.9% of games
7.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 49.2% of games
8.5
0%
0W–6L · 24.2% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.4% of games
4.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
24.2%
8W–25L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
78 matches
Singles
6%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert