← Search

Stan Rodgers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 151W–91L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history242 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Johnson/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Starks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Johnson/Springdale/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nellie Beall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamia Weir mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Stafford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · Johnson/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Penny Churchill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Herrmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · Johnson/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Starks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Starks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Galloway championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
74.1%
63W–22L · 59.7% of games
4.0
50%
16W–16L · 49.2% of games
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 57.9% of games
7.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 57.6% of games
3.5mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
36 matches
#1 Singles
12%
29 matches
Singles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer