← Search

John Vargo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 96W–126L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-10-06 · Lasater-Short/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Edran Ali
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-13 · Vargo-Lasater/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle Fullmer
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Vargo-Lasater/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deric Neal
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Bashara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Warner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Bashara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · Vargo/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deric Neal
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholaa Colucci
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-29 · Vargo/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremiah McLaughlin
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-04-20 · Vargo/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremiah McLaughlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
49.3%
37W–38L · 52.2% of games
3.25
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
3.5
44.3%
27W–34L · 49.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games
6.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 50.7% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0%
0W–10L · 34.5% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova