← Search

Ginny Herrmann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 60W–29L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history89 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nellie Beall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-13 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alex Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-04 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brynne Dyrhood
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stan Rodgers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Gabbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hierholzer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Edmiaston
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Edmiaston
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hierholzer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 63.5% of games
3.5
63%
17W–10L · 56.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.9% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams