← Search

Kevin Lollar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 51W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history89 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Hultquist championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Hultquist championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Hultquist championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Lollar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Hultquist
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-22 · Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle Fullmer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-31 · Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle Fullmer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Letts-Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Gagliardo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 55.9% of games
3.25
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert