← Search

Jamia Weir

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gentry, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 144W–76L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history220 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Gabbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stan Rodgers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-07 · Fenton/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Edmiaston
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronnie Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Fry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merideth Richards championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen HIckman
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
2.25
50%
2W–2L · 48.9% of games
2.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.6% of games
2.75
50%
7W–7L · 48.4% of games
3.0
80.4%
45W–11L · 58.6% of games
3.25
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
36W–12L · 57.7% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 53.4% of games
5.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.9% of games
6.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.7% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.4% of games
3.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.2% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#1 Singles
24%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#2 Singles
13%
28 matches
Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe