← Search

Natalie Anderson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 75W–54L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history129 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Wetzel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-06 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Hoffmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Barkley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wen Su
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janett Rivera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shashikanth Divakaruni mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shashikanth Divakaruni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shashikanth Divakaruni mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-28 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Tania Salgueiro
2026-06-27 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Schley/Springdale/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Bright
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
72%
18W–7L · 62.1% of games
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 60.2% of games
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 49.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 45.1% of games
5.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 36.2% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 57% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 22% of the time
#1 Singles
22%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
24 matches
Singles
13%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams