← Search

Julie Ralston

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 55W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Page
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Donnell/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chere' Skinner
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Ferrer-Overton/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chere' Skinner championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-12 · Ferrer-Overton/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chere' Skinner championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Thomas Madsen championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · Senlikci-Boen/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Thomas Madsen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · Ferrer-Overton/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah White
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Kryzo-Menendez/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Murray
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-04-24 · Ferrer-Overton/Bentonville/MRC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chere' Skinner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-04-23 · Senlikci-Boen/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelli Bell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-22 · Senlikci-Boen/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kryzanowsky
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Kryzo-Menendez/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Callie Brannon
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.3% of games
2.75
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
3.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 61.8% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 46.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39.3% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer