← Search

Jennifer Tarnasky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 79W–56L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history135 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Armstrong
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merideth Richards
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wise
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Sandlin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Senlikci
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wise
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Thomas Madsen
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Himes
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-04-28 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Anderson
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games
2.75
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games
3.0
71.1%
27W–11L · 59% of games
3.25
0%
0W–6L · 28.3% of games
3.5
66.7%
30W–15L · 56.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova