← Search

Anne Vargo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
401 matches · 250W–151L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history401 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with ZOHARA MORALLI
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-12 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Marley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-10-07 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-06 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelley Cullen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-01 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Peng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-20 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Peng
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Kenny/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-30 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Marley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Rosas
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Mejia/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristina Rosas
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-18 · AR 3.5W 18 & Over (Letts) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Talia McGowan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.0
100%
10W–0L · 67.6% of games
2.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.6% of games
2.75
75%
3W–1L · 73.8% of games
3.0
70.4%
57W–24L · 56% of games
3.25
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.1% of games
3.5
55.4%
62W–50L · 53.2% of games
3.75
75%
3W–1L · 53% of games
4.0
40%
12W–18L · 42.7% of games
5.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
5.5
84%
21W–4L · 65.9% of games
6.5
80%
28W–7L · 63.5% of games
7.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
86 matches
#1 Singles
20%
79 matches
#2 Singles
6%
23 matches
#3 Singles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert