← Search

Kara Welton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 126W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history204 matches
W
2026-10-21 · Curtis/Bella Vista/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maggie Griesse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-10-03 · Curtis/Bella Vista/MRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-14 · Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janis Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-30 · Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Young
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Gross/Lowell/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Hanafin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · Gross/Lowell/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Hanafin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Snell/Rogers/MRC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Watson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Bianconi/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlynn Bianconi
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Snell/Rogers/MRC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marilyn Hendrix
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-07 · Snell/Rogers/MRC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Gross
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-18 · Bianconi/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clara Park
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-07 · Snell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Snell
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.25
100%
4W–0L · 63.8% of games
2.5
77.3%
34W–10L · 59.6% of games
2.75
73.7%
14W–5L · 58.4% of games
3.0
50.8%
32W–31L · 50.1% of games
3.25
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.1% of games
5.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.7% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.9% of games
3.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
32 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert