← Search

Samantha Thiede Erickson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 105W–112L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-20 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-14 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-09 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Killingsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-29 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Mayer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Hendrix
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-30 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-07-28 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Erickson/Springdale/IND · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Chilton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.25
100%
6W–0L · 79.1% of games
2.5
65.5%
36W–19L · 56.3% of games
2.75
22.2%
2W–7L · 32.5% of games
3.0
42.7%
32W–43L · 47.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games
5.5
54.8%
17W–14L · 52.8% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.4% of games
3.0mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 37.8% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Singles
12%
25 matches
#2 Singles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal