← Search

Mary Pat Calvert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 72W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history130 matches
W
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Ring/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauri Steeland
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-23 · LCTA54/Foley/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Keith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-09 · LCTA54/Foley/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Keith
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-02 · LCTA54/Foley/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Currie Boyd
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Koysza championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Ring championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Sass championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · LCTA (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Howle) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Howle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.3% of games
3.5
57%
53W–40L · 51% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.1% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
11%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer