← Search

Joellen Joy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 100W–122L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-10-21 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Borden/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Ellman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Crailin Hardy Best
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-03 · Borden/BV/KTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Borden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-30 · Borden/BV/KTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Ellman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Borden/BV/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Ellman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-16 · Van Schenck/Garfield/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Buffy Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Beckstead mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Beckstead/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Beckstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Beckstead/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Forrest mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-03 · Beckstead/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Forrest mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Kavanaugh-Elshoff/Springdale/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Beckstead championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
63.4%
59W–34L · 55.8% of games
3.25
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.8% of games
3.5
20%
9W–36L · 40.1% of games
3.75
0%
0W–4L · 21.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 57.3% of games
6.5
46.8%
22W–25L · 48.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer