← Search

Christine Revolinski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bella Vista, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 105W–121L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history226 matches
L
2026-10-03 · Carr/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Oswald
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-30 · Carr/Bentonville/KTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marian Knaust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-20 · Carr/Bentonville/KTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Hufford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Waters championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Waters championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Revolinski/BV/KTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Ellman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · Revolinski/BV/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Waters
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-20 · Revolinski/BV/KTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Casey/Bella Vista/KTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Waters
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-12 · Revolinski/BV/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Waters
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Casey/Bella Vista/KTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Johnson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · Kavanaugh-Elshoff/Springdale/KTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Jones
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
70.4%
38W–16L · 58.9% of games
4.0
36.3%
37W–65L · 46.2% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 62% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
6W–22L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer