← Search

Mariko Paschall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 114W–110L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history224 matches
W
2026-10-08 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ellen Lundy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Misty Compton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-30 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Misty Compton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-20 · Juergens/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Debby Blackburn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jamie Juergens
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Salmon
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Corbett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-17 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Corbett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Elleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Salmon
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Davis Elleman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Paschall/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Salmon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
87%
20W–3L · 65.9% of games
4.25
87.5%
14W–2L · 64.9% of games
4.5
41.7%
40W–56L · 48.1% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 61.6% of games
8.5
50%
21W–21L · 51.6% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 22.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.2% of games
8.0mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal