← Search

Emily Saffran

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 121W–80L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history201 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rebecca Callaway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-11 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cecilia Raymond
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Welborn-Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Cunningham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-5
L
2026-08-02 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Lasater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-8
W
2026-07-25 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jazmin Taylor championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jazmin Taylor championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Van Matre/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Purkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.6%
40W–9L · 65.6% of games
4.25
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.8% of games
4.5
43.8%
21W–27L · 48.4% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 63.5% of games
8.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 49.5% of games
4.5mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe