← Search

Samuel Jackson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 79W–83L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history162 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Carr/Andersen/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Stevens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Carr/Andersen/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marc Nixon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Klug mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Klug mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · Mitchell/Bentonville/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassie Dyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-6
W
2026-08-02 · Mitchell/Bentonville/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cassie Dyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-3
W
2026-07-27 · Mesaris/Jackson/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Ewersmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Mesaris/Jackson/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzanne Klug mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · Mesaris/Jackson/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Whitney Ewersmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lee Mesaris championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Edwin Lowther championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.7% of games
4.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 50.1% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 38.7% of games
9.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.5% of games
4.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
42 matches
Singles
20%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer