← Search

Emily Keathley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bryant, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 144W–57L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history201 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carley Glenn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Baptist/LR/REB · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meritt Harrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Baptist/LR/REB · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Baptist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-21 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carley Glenn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Quilao championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Heffernan championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Simon championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Oko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-01 · Yeatts/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kara Oko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Manasco mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Manasco mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · Murdock/Bender/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Stevens
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 73.6% of games
3.25
100%
6W–0L · 70.1% of games
3.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 71.6% of games
3.75
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.2%
43W–23L · 58.6% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 76.8% of games
7.5
81%
17W–4L · 59.2% of games
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 54% of games
4.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 51.4% of games
4.5mixed
0%
0W–8L · 29% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.4% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
39 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova