← Search

Colleen Youngdahl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 174W–76L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history250 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Turriff/Allmond/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaclyn Bracey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Jeter/LR/CCLR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessie McLarty
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-01 · Turriff/Allmond/LR/LRAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaclyn Bracey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Jeter/LR/CCLR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-21 · Holt/LR/LRRC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Holt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · Jeter/LR/CCLR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marcie Jeter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-13 · Walls/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Delgado
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · Walls/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Younger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Quilao championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffani Jedlicka championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-09 · Holt/LR/LRRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Richardson Watson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · Aguilar/Sellew/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mat Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.25
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
3.5
72.7%
32W–12L · 62.8% of games
3.75
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
4.0
78.7%
74W–20L · 60.1% of games
4.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.6% of games
6.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 65.8% of games
7.5
66.7%
24W–12L · 57.7% of games
8.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 56.4% of games
4.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 55.4% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 28% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
56 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams