← Search

Davis Elleman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 26W–24L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-28 · Musser-Zimmerschied/Fayetteville/UREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luc Ashurst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-09 · Musser-Zimmerschied/Fayetteville/UREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jp Tomberlain
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-24 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariko Paschall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · Tevonian/Bentonville/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariko Paschall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · Lundstrum-Nayani/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Lundstrum championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Benjamin Hollis championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Spencer Holloway championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 52.7% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.6% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.7% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert