← Search

Jeff Greer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rogers, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 99W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history171 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Letts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-13 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jonathan Bricker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-11 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicholaa Colucci
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-22 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Letts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-20 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tr Rose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Fitzpatrick/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tr Rose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbi Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbi Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbi Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · Nelson-Zana/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Cicatiello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbi Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · Zana-Greer/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Cicatiello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
80%
48W–12L · 62.5% of games
3.25
30%
3W–7L · 45% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 50% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.6% of games
6.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 51.6% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
45%
9W–11L · 52.2% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert