← Search

Suzy Bender

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 111W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history204 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Thalheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-10-01 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Milli Stanley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Rainey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-17 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Rockefeller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Stevens championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Telford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Compton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Compton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Compton mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Luneau mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Luneau mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lee Mesaris mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 72.7% of games
3.25
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 54.8% of games
3.75
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
51%
25W–24L · 50.7% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.5% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
9W–3L · 60.3% of games
7.5
20%
3W–12L · 41.1% of games
4.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 48.8% of games
4.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.7% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams