← Search

Milli Stanley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sherwood, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
350 matches · 216W–134L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history350 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Worley/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Reed
loading the estimate
0-1
W
2026-10-21 · Lane/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Bloomfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-07 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Baker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-05 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christy Simecka Morgan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-10-01 · Stevens/Breaker/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzy Bender
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-27 · OATES/RVILLE/BP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robbie Rutherford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-22 · Stanley/Sherwood/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mimi Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-21 · OATES/RVILLE/BP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Baker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Althoff championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Staggs championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · OATES/RVILLE/BP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deanna Garretson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-02 · Stanley/Sherwood/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Shepherd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
2.25
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
69.8%
30W–13L · 60.5% of games
2.75
81.8%
9W–2L · 72.5% of games
3.0
70.5%
43W–18L · 59.9% of games
3.25
50%
3W–3L · 55.8% of games
3.5
51.4%
36W–34L · 52.1% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 38% of games
5.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 58.2% of games
6.5
67.6%
23W–11L · 57.4% of games
7.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.6% of games
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.3% of games
3.5mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
89 matches
#1 Singles
5%
17 matches
Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams