← Search

Melissa Riddle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Little Rock, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
261 matches · 136W–125L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history261 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Beavers/Riddle/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Webb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wells championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wells championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-09 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wells championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-30 · Guffey/Bryant/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Shepard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-24 · Beavers/Riddle/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zeynep Vural
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-22 · Guffey/Bryant/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robbin Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-13 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hannah championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hannah championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-09-12 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Bloomfield championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-11 · Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hannah championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · Guffey/Bryant/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Rowland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 63% of games
3.25
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.6% of games
3.5
37.9%
36W–59L · 43.7% of games
3.75
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.1%
33W–21L · 55.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games
3.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
63 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer