← Search

Smita Thakur

Waxhaw, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
143 matches · 76W–67L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Waxhaw · 4.0
16 of 17
NC · 4.0
76 of 105
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Smita is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Smita has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Smita has gone from the 68th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 53.6% of games
4.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 39% of games
7.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 56.6% of games
8.5
25%
4W–12L · 40.1% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
Stephanie Stanton / Wanda Thomas
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Olsen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Rachael Schuler / Lance Kingmixed
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramesh Thyagarajan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
Allison Homan / Susan Jaffe
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with India Branker
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with India Branker
−0.103below expectation — took 8% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jacqueline Cugliari / Stephan Custermixed
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramesh Thyagarajan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
Leslie Masucci / Frank Masuccimixed
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandrasekar Swaminathan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
Lynn Hughes / Tammy Basinger
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katy Hart
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-5
L
Sandy Mullis / Mike Bostonmixed
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ramesh Thyagarajan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
Paige Whitney / Amy Erwin
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Wright
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Kristy Simmons / Sonia Waters
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Hart
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Heather Skelton
2026-04-14 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.