← Search

Kristin Kapur

Matthews, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 135W–63L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kristin Kapur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-09-07 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelley Montroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-31 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Ovendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Misty Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-20 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sally Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-17 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Ranadive
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · BMarthinsen (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristy Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Austin Taylor / Emily Weigel
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Kristy Brannock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Ritter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Conway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · MJones (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · KKapur/Brannock (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Wolf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · MJones (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 72.9% of games
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 63.5% of games
4.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 54.1% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.2% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.5% of games
7.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 55.1% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
3.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 62.6% of games
4.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 56.1% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
20%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
35 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert