← Search

Kristin Bergeson

Waxhaw, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 101W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kristin Bergeson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-08-31 · KHart (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with India Branker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · KHart (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with India Branker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · KHart (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with India Branker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Bergeson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · RO'Rourke/DTyson (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Bergeson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Bergeson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Levitas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-13 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kari McGregor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leonard Evansek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Hodge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · CSpera (Blakeney) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with DIANE HORNER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 58.1% of games
4.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.9% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 68.3% of games
7.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 50.2% of games
3.5mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer