← Search

Mary Claire Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 33W–54L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-30 · CTharp (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eve Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · CTharp (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eve Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · CTharp (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eve Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · CTharp (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Julian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · CTharp (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Kendrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-16 · CTharp (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Cardell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · CTharp (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Stormer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · ADutton/KJernigan (Hornets Nest) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · ADutton/KJernigan (Hornets Nest) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 49.3% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.6% of games
5.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 64.6% of games
6.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.4% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Singles
15%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#3 Singles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova