← Search

Allison Moss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 23W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history41 matches
W
2026-10-02 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lesley Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-25 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Hillard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-03 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meredith Camper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-21 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Hillard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Logan Foose
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marshall Wyker
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Johnsen Priester
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marshall Wyker championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Worthington
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hillard championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Withers
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-24 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.2% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50% of games
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.8% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams