← Search

Allison Worthington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 28W–9L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history37 matches
W
2026-09-18 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caroline Withers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Logan Foose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan McKeever
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lesley Burke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashley Hall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Moss
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Thomas championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hillard championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Logan Foose
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hillard
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Logan Foose
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.8% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.4% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.7% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer