← Search

Megan McKeever

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 41W–14L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-10-09 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina Cottingham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-25 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marshall Wyker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-11 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-21 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Worthington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Logan Foose
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Hillard
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-01 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Corso
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily McEwen championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-15 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Thomas championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · MKleber (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Withers
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.6% of games
4.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 56.6% of games
7.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.4% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
23 matches
#1 Singles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova