← Search

Amber Brannon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 64W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history94 matches
L
2026-09-25 · TOrmand/TDries (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vanessa Elias
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-03 · ASunden (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katrina Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · LAMO-Morris/NMP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine Kahm
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-08 · MShaul/KRichards (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sybil Cioffi
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · MShaul/KRichards (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Elias
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · MShaul/KRichards (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brantlee Green
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-24 · TOrmand (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meritt Schoening
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · ASunden/SAustin (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Elias
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-26 · ASunden/SAustin (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Elias
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · TOrmand (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meritt Schoening
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-19 · ASunden/SAustin (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Elias
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-12 · ASunden/SAustin (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Elias
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 62.4% of games
4.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 56.8% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 61.7% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 76% of the time
#1 Doubles
76%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova