← Search

Anita Corum

MATTHEWS, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 93W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anita Corum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-09-03 · NHaskins (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophie Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · NHaskins (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elisa Salim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Michele Ovendorf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenelle Grissinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · KBrannock/KKapur (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Brannock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzy Sandbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · FGrindle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Holcman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · KBrannock/JWolf (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Diller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · FGrindle (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Kolepp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Ovendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · KBrannock/JWolf (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Diller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · KBrannock/JWolf (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Ritter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 59.8% of games
4.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.4% of games
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50.6% of games
4.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams