← Search

Alven Weil

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 62W–56L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alven Weil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-09-07 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-31 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek Norman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-17 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nanci Weil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Claire Cox / David Richardson
2026-06-30 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela MacMurphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · JScovanner (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Kerr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60%
18W–12L · 54.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
11W–22L · 46% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.3% of games
7.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.3% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches
#1 Singles
17%
20 matches
#1 Male Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer