← Search

Suzy Sandbo

Waxhaw, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 80W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Suzy Sandbo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
W
2026-09-08 · SPierle (Weddington) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamara Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-1
W
2026-09-07 · CChildress (Chlt Tennis Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-17 · CChildress (Chlt Tennis Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-08-13 · SPierle (Weddington) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Garvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · CChildress (Chlt Tennis Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Childress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Tamara Gallagher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Corum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · TGallagher/Pierle (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Corum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · TGallagher (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Waud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · with Tamara Gallagher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 53.7% of games
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 46.4% of games
7.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 52.6% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal