← Search

Christine Kahm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHARLOTTE, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 28W–21L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history49 matches
W
2026-10-06 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Brinneman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-04 · LAMO-Morris/NMP · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michele Sutherland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Sickles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-13 · LAMO-Morris/NMP · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Colleen Beierwaltes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · LAMO-Morris/NMP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amber Brannon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · DWest/CWincek (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Chillag
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana West championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madison Lohnes championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lina Clarke championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Chillag championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-14 · LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Meiners
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 60.1% of games
8.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.6% of games
9.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova