← Search

Jane Sickles

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 110W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jane Sickles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
W
2026-09-08 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jordan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary-Margaret James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jordan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alison Lacy Sherrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alison Lacy Sherrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · TBrooks (Charlotte Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Varn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Carol Childress championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Barbara Smith / Brenda Cohen
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with Nily Willis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Brantlee Green championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-14 · TLWGO-Goodwin/Bailey Tri Tues 55+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kari Comadoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-03 · NWillis (Park Road) · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 66.3% of games
4.0
71.2%
37W–15L · 59% of games
4.5
25%
5W–15L · 39.6% of games
8.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 42.7% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 35.6% of games
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#1 Singles
19%
36 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King