← Search

Jordan Bowers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Mill, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 131W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history213 matches
L
2026-09-29 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Sickles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane Sickles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · DJKarasik (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with DJ Karasik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · DJKarasik (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luke Mixon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · DJKarasik (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-11 · JVarn (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Varn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-09-15 · JVarn (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Varn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-08 · JVarn (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Varn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-08-25 · JVarn (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Varn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Green mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-08-18 · JVarn (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jessica Varn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.1% of games
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.9% of games
4.5
73.1%
38W–14L · 59.7% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.9% of games
8.5
58.8%
30W–21L · 53.5% of games
9.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 40.7% of games
4.5mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.3% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
20W–12L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert