← Search

Karen Hillard

CHARLOTTE, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 53W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Karen Hillard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-09-11 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meredith Camper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-28 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marshall Wyker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan McKeever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Allison Moss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · with Allison Worthington championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · MKleber (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-27 · MKleber (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Worthington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-13 · MKleber (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily McEwen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.3% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.8% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 54.2% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe