← Search

Heather Hope

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 132W–108L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history240 matches
W
Default
2026-10-09 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-02 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-28 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Waltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-26 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-04 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Barbara Moysaenko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-21 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Breeze Watson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-17 · DShealy (Firethorne) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxanne Kastein
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · DShealy (Firethorne) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxanne Kastein
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.3% of games
3.5
72.7%
32W–12L · 58% of games
4.0
52.5%
42W–38L · 49.7% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.9% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 68.2% of games
7.5
68%
34W–16L · 58.4% of games
8.5
31.8%
14W–30L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#1 Singles
10%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova