← Search

Whitney Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 113W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history181 matches
W
2026-09-28 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Erwin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-25 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Iannuzzi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-09-14 · LGignac (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Megan Gilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-11 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Hahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-01 · LGignac (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindy Gignac
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suzannah Hicks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Halverstam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Dwyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Hahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Sutker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Karasik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · SKarasik/AKaiser (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Shamanis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 64.2% of games
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 61% of games
4.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 60.3% of games
4.5
5.9%
1W–16L · 32.8% of games
6.5
72%
18W–7L · 60% of games
7.5
77.8%
21W–6L · 62.8% of games
8.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 48.8% of games
4.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.7% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#1 Singles
13%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer