← Search

Julie Grahl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 105W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history150 matches
L
2026-10-09 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Hill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-05 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicole Woodley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-02 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-28 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Clancy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Mulcahy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · MMetzl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Crosby championship
loading the estimate
0-1
L
2026-09-19 · MMetzl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fumiyo Ono championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · MMetzl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-14 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Clancy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rubina Batt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Conrad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Mulcahy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 68.5% of games
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 60% of games
4.0
85.7%
30W–5L · 66% of games
4.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.8% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 64.7% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.9% of games
8.5
62.9%
22W–13L · 57.5% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer