← Search

Lauren Mulcahy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 86W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Diaz championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · JBlack (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Madeline Weih
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Grahl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-19 · JWalker/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Martin championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-19 · JWalker/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Martin championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-18 · JWalker/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Martin championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Diaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · JBlack (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Diaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-04 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Diaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Grahl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · JBlack (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Diaz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · JWalker/MMetzl (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Crosby championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 64.3% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.7% of games
4.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 57.5% of games
4.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.6% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 56.9% of games
8.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 50.5% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King