← Search

Lindy Gignac

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 120W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history213 matches
L
2026-09-21 · LGignac (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Erwin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-11 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Halverstam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-04 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Halverstam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · LGignac (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Whitney Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Erwin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · LGignac (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Solomon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Sevigny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Halverstam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzannah Hicks
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · LGignac (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Suzannah Hicks
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · LGignac (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Solomon
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · WSmith/LRabidou (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rosie Rogers
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.1% of games
4.0
62.7%
52W–31L · 55.2% of games
4.5
10.3%
3W–26L · 33.3% of games
6.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.1% of games
7.5
70.2%
33W–14L · 57.2% of games
8.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
27 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert