← Search

Danielle Conrad

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 62W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history83 matches
L
2026-10-09 · KWainscott/CMcWilliams (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Smart
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-05 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · KWainscott/CMcWilliams (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina McWilliams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Grahl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-28 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colleen Terschluse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 1-1
L
2026-08-21 · KWainscott/CMcWilliams (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Traci Semones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · AConger/DConrad (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Danesis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · KWainscott/CMcWilliams (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Traci Semones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Crosby
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Mulcahy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Clancy
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Smulktis
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.2% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
4.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.3% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 70.1% of games
7.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 59.7% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert