← Search

Mallory Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 87W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history98 matches
W
2026-10-09 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina Desai
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-28 · MMiller (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Costello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Bumgardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-04 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Bumgardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · MMiller (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meg Perry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-23 · MMiller (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Costello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Costello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Bumgardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Peterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
Default
2026-05-08 · MMiller (Myers Park) · #1 Singles · 4.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · MPerry (Alexander St Park) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Peterson
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · MKleber (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Costello
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 76.5% of games
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 65.1% of games
4.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 69.6% of games
4.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 62.5% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 70.3% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.1% of games
8.5
80%
12W–3L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams