← Search

Marissa Kleber

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 69W–48L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-25 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-07 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Louis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-04 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Grant
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Louis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · MKleber (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hall
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Walker championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mallory Miller championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Ostrow championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.3% of games
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.6% of games
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 59.8% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.2% of games
5.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.9% of games
6.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 52.5% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.8% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 68.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer